ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
Obstetrician-Gynecologist Perspectives and Counseling Practices on the U.S. Medicaid Waiting Period for Permanent Contraception.
Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Obstetricians' experiences caring for pregnant people experiencing incarceration who request permanent contraception.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCreated to protect patients from coercive sterilization, the federally mandated 30-day waiting period for patients with Medicaid desiring permanent contraception is a known barrier to permanent contraception fulfillment. Existing research does not explicitly explore how physicians interpret and operationalize the consent policy, how they counsel regarding the waiting period, or whether physicians believe the policy should be revised. The purpose of this paper is to better understand obstetrician-gynecologist (OB-GYN) feelings, thoughts, and counseling practices around the waiting period as key stakeholders in counseling and provision of permanent contraception care. BASIC PROCEDURES: We interviewed 81 postpartum people with a documented desire for permanent contraception and 61 OB-GYNs who delivered their infants at four hospitals across the United States. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis and thematic content analysis. MAIN
findingsForty-seven physicians (70.2%) expressed negative feelings toward the Medicaid waiting period policy and 14 (20.9%) expressed neutral/mixed feelings. Physicians often viewed the Medicaid sterilization consent policy as inequitable and reported feeling that the waiting period hinders patient autonomy. Several physicians suggested that the waiting period needs revision. Physicians cited several barriers related to the implementation of the waiting period, including a lack of prenatal care or the conversation not being initiated. Physicians mentioned various approaches to counseling around the waiting period, either explicitly or inexplicitly explaining the policy. Last, physicians discussed differing interpretations around the waiting period policy. PRINCIPAL
conclusionsPhysicians in our sample largely do not favor the current Medicaid sterilization waiting period. However, physicians report varying approaches to clinical counseling as well as beliefs regarding policy revision. Revision to the policy should be informed by the lived experience and expertise of the various stakeholders, including patients, clinicians, and policymakers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.