Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39965943›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Assessing the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring compared with conventional monitoring in enhancing surgical outcomes for patients with diabetes: protocol for a multicentre, parallel-arm, randomised, pragmatic trial in China.

Yi Duan, Lin Ding, Zhifeng Gao, Yutong Wang, Han Cao, Huan Zhang, Lan Yao

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06331923 (Assessing the Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared With Conventional Monitoring in Enhancing Surgical Outcomes for Patients With Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06331923 nacompletednot on this map

Assessing the Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared With Conventional Monitoring in Enhancing Surgical Outcomes for Patients With Diabetes: a Multi-center, Parallel-arm, Randomized, Pragmatic Trial in China

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tsinghua Chang Gung HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled9,877ConditionsComprehensive Complication IndexArmsContinuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yi Duan *Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Lin Ding *Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zhifeng GaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China btchgzf@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6379-3139
Yutong WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Han CaoMedical Data Science Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Huan ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Lan YaoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) is an internationally recognised indicator of postoperative complications. During the perioperative period, patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) may experience a significant increase in the CCI associated with glucose-related complications and increased mortality. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offers advantages such as portability, accuracy, real-time monitoring and rich information. However, few large-scale studies have investigated the effectiveness and safety of CGM in reducing CCI during major surgeries. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a multicentre, parallel-arm, randomised pragmatic trial to investigate whether CGM improves clinical outcomes in patients with type 1 or type 2 DM or IGT undergoing major surgery relative to conventional monitoring. This study is planned to be conducted in 50 secondary or tertiary hospitals in China. Eligible patients aged 18 years or older with DM or IGT undergoing elective major surgery will be recruited during a baseline screening period of 3 days before surgery. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive CGM or conventional monitoring in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint measure is the CCI score within 30 postoperative days. The margin of superiority is -12.0. A total of 10 168 participants will achieve 90% power to detect a clinically important difference of -13.0 between the means in the primary outcome. This trial includes multiple statistical analysis steps. For the primary outcome, a covariance model will be used to compare the difference in CCI within 30 days postoperatively between the two groups after adjusting for baseline and centre effects. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital (No. 23684-0-02) and its corresponding branch centres. Informed consent will be obtained from all subjects involved in the study. The primary trial results will be submitted for publication to a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06331923.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucose IntolerancePostoperative ComplicationsAdultChinaContinuous Glucose MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBlood GlucoseClinical ProtocolsDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYRandomised Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID39965943
PMCPMC11836829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.