ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2025
Predicting diabetes self-management education engagement: machine learning algorithms and models.
Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a nurse-led self-management intervention on health outcomes in patients with diabetic retinopathy undergoing vitrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Trial
- Artificial intelligence in chronic disease self-management: current applications and future directions.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Federated multimodal AI for precision-equitable diabetes care.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDiabetes self-management education (DSME) is endorsed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) as an essential component of diabetes management. However, the utilization of DSME remains limited in the USA. This study aimed to investigate current DSME participation among the older population and to identify comprehensive factors of DSME engagement through employing various machine learning (ML) models based on a US nationally representative survey linked to claims data. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsData from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey were employed, and this study included data on US Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes from 2017 to 2019. Comprehensive variables following the National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework were employed to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of factors associated with DSME using five common ML approaches.
resultsIn our study, 37.94% of participants received DSME after the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 95 variables were used and all ML models achieved accuracy scores exceeding 70%. Random forest had better predictive performance, with an accuracy of 85%. Seventy-four of 95 variables were identified as key variables. Racial/ethnic disparities in predictors for DSME were identified in this study.
conclusionsThis study identified comprehensive and critical factors associated with DSME engagement from biological, behavioral, sociocultural, and environmental domains using different ML models, as well as related racial/ethnic disparities. Aligning these findings with the DSME National Standards from the ADA would enhance the guidelines' effectiveness, promoting tailored and equal diabetes management approaches that cater to diverse races/ethnicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.