Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39965870›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2025

Predicting diabetes self-management education engagement: machine learning algorithms and models.

Xiangxiang Jiang, Gang Lv, Minghui Li, Jing Yuan, Z Kevin Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiangxiang Jiang *Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7247-0077
Gang Lv *Department of General Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center, Beijing, China.
Minghui LiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1909-6260
Jing YuanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Z Kevin LuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina, USA lu32@mailbox.sc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiabetes self-management education (DSME) is endorsed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) as an essential component of diabetes management. However, the utilization of DSME remains limited in the USA. This study aimed to investigate current DSME participation among the older population and to identify comprehensive factors of DSME engagement through employing various machine learning (ML) models based on a US nationally representative survey linked to claims data. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsData from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey were employed, and this study included data on US Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes from 2017 to 2019. Comprehensive variables following the National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework were employed to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of factors associated with DSME using five common ML approaches.

resultsIn our study, 37.94% of participants received DSME after the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 95 variables were used and all ML models achieved accuracy scores exceeding 70%. Random forest had better predictive performance, with an accuracy of 85%. Seventy-four of 95 variables were identified as key variables. Racial/ethnic disparities in predictors for DSME were identified in this study.

conclusionsThis study identified comprehensive and critical factors associated with DSME engagement from biological, behavioral, sociocultural, and environmental domains using different ML models, as well as related racial/ethnic disparities. Aligning these findings with the DSME National Standards from the ADA would enhance the guidelines' effectiveness, promoting tailored and equal diabetes management approaches that cater to diverse races/ethnicities.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiabetes MellitusMachine LearningPatient Education as TopicSelf-ManagementAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMedicareUnited StatesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Health EducationHealth Promotion

Identifiers

PMID39965870
PMCPMC11836835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.