Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39965475›Full record

SynthesisEnvironment international2025

GRADE guidance 40: The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework for environmental and occupational health.

Emily Senerth, Paul Whaley, Elie Akl, Brandy Beverly, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Andrew Rooney, Holger J Schünemann, Kristina A Thayer, Katya Tsaioun, Rebecca L Morgan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environment international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Planetary Health in Health Guidelines: Expert Workshop Report 2024.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emily SenerthDepartment of Epidemiology, George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, 950 New Hampshire Ave NW #2, Washington, DC 20052, USA; Evidence-based Toxicology Collaboration at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Rm: W7032, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Paul WhaleyEvidence-based Toxicology Collaboration at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Rm: W7032, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK. Electronic address: paul@whaleyresearch.uk.
Elie AklAmerican University of Beirut, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Brandy BeverlyDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, P.O. Box 12233, Mail Drop K2-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Pablo Alonso-CoelloIberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Building 18, 08025 Barcelona, Spain; Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Andrew RooneyDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, P.O. Box 12233, Mail Drop K2-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Holger J SchünemannClinical Epidemiology and Research Center (CERC), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4 - 20090 Pieve Emanuele (Milano), Italy.
Kristina A ThayerCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical & Pollutant Assessment Division, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Building B (Room 211i), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Katya TsaiounEvidence-based Toxicology Collaboration at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Rm: W7032, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Rebecca L MorganCochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE Centres & Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C14, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada; School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. Electronic address: morganrl@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide guidance for the use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) framework for environmental and occupational health (EOH). STUDY DESIGN AND

settingWe conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis of published and public EOH decision frameworks, followed by a modified Delphi process leading to development of a draft GRADE EtD framework for EOH. We pilot tested the provisional framework through a virtual workshop series, which further informed guidance for the framework's application. We presented a summary of the results to all attendees of the GRADE Working Group meeting for feedback in July 2022 and November 2022, and for approval in May 2023.

resultsConsistent with existing GRADE EtD frameworks, the EtD framework for EOH includes a scoping and contextualization process and twelve assessment criteria. Modifications to the existing EtD frameworks include: consideration of the socio-political context when making judgments about the priority of the problem and feasibility of different alternatives; the addition of timing when making judgments about benefits and harms, the balance of effects, and feasibility; broadening of the equity criterion to include considerations beyond health equity; and more explicit accommodation of variable or conflicting stakeholder views when considering values and acceptability. The new EtD framework is also accompanied by a user guide intended to support its implementation in the EOH context.

conclusionPolicymakers, regulators, and other stakeholders may use this GRADE EtD framework to approach decision-making about environmental and occupational exposures and interventions.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthOccupational HealthDecision MakingDelphi TechniqueHumansDecision frameworkDecision-makingEnvironmental healthGRADEOccupational health

Identifiers

PMID39965475
PMCPMC11930603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.