Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39965354›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2025

Exploring hyperelastic material model discovery for human brain cortex: Multivariate analysis vs. artificial neural network approaches.

Jixin Hou, Nicholas Filla, Xianyan Chen, Mir Jalil Razavi, Dajiang Zhu, Tianming Liu, Xianqiao Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jixin HouSchool of ECAM, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Nicholas FillaSchool of ECAM, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Xianyan ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Mir Jalil RazaviDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, 13902, USA.
Dajiang ZhuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA.
Tianming LiuSchool of Computing, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Xianqiao WangSchool of ECAM, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. Electronic address: xqwang@uga.edu.

Funding

Mapping Trajectories of Alzheimer's Progression via Personalized Brain Anchor-nodesR01AG075582 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON · PI Gang Li, Dajiang Zhu · 2022 to 2026
$2.7M
Developing an Individualized Deep Connectome Framework for ADRD AnalysisRF1NS128534 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON · PI LI, GANG, LIU, TIANMING · 2022 to 2022
$1.7M
SCH: Using Data-Driven Computational Biomechanics to Disentangle Brain Structural Commonality, Variability, and Abnormality in ASDR01NS135574 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI Xianqiao Wang · 2023 to 2026
$1.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG075582NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS135574NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS128534NSF CMMI-2123061NSF IIS-2011369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain, characterized by its intricate architecture, exhibits complex mechanical properties that underpin its critical functional capabilities. Traditional computational methods, such as finite element analysis, have been instrumental in uncovering the fundamental mechanisms governing the brain's physical behaviors. However, accurate predictions of brain mechanics require effective constitutive models to represent the nuanced mechanical properties of brain tissue. In this study, we aimed to identify well-suited material models for human brain tissue by leveraging artificial neural network and multiple regression techniques. These methods were applied to a generalized framework of widely accepted classic models, and their respective outcomes were systematically compared. To evaluate model efficacy, all setups were maintained consistent across both approaches, except for strategies employed to mitigate potential overfitting. Our findings reveal that artificial neural networks are capable of automatically identifying accurate constitutive models from given admissible estimators. However, the five-term and two-term neural network models trained under single-mode and multi-mode loading scenarios, respectively, were found to be suboptimal. These models could be further simplified into two-term and single-term formulations using multiple regression, achieving even higher predictive accuracy. This refinement underscores the importance of rigorous cross-validations of regularization parameters in neural network-based methods to ensure globally optimal model selection. Additionally, our study demonstrates that traditional multivariable regression methods, when combined with appropriate information criterion, are also highly effective in discovering optimal constitutive models. These insights contribute to the ongoing development of advanced material constitutive models, particularly for complex biological tissues.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexElasticityNeural Networks, ComputerBiomechanical PhenomenaFinite Element AnalysisHumansMultivariate AnalysisBrain mechanicsConstitutive artificial neural networksConstitutive modelingHuman brain cortexMultiple regression

Identifiers

PMID39965354
PMCPMC12205915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.