ArticlePloS one2025
Assessing benthic invertebrate vulnerability to ocean acidification and de-oxygenation in California: The importance of effective oceanographic monitoring networks.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Greenhouse gas emissions from land-use change, fossil fuel, agriculture, transportation, and electricity sectors expose marine ecosystems to overlapping environmental stressors. Existing climate vulnerability assessment methods analyze the frequency of extreme conditions but often minimally consider how environmental data gaps hinder assessments. Here, we show an approach that assesses vulnerability and the uncertainty introduced by monitoring data gaps, using a case study of ocean acidification and deoxygenation in coastal California. We employ 5 million publicly available oceanographic observations and existing studies on species responses to low pH, low oxygen conditions to calculate vulnerability for six ecologically and economically valuable benthic invertebrate species: red sea urchin (Mesocentrotus franciscanus), purple sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpurpatus), warty sea cucumber (Apostichopus parvimensis), pink shrimp (Pandalus jordani), California spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus), and Dungeness crab (Metacarncinus magister). Further, we evaluate the efficacy of current monitoring programs by examining how data gaps heighten associated uncertainty. We find that most organisms experience low oxygen (<35% saturation) conditions less frequently than low pH ( < 7.6) conditions. It is only deeper dwelling (>75 m depth) life stages such as Dungeness crab adults and pink shrimp embryos, juveniles, and adults that experience more frequent exposure to low oxygen conditions. Adult Dungeness crabs experience the strongest seasonal variation in exposure. Though these trends are intriguing, exposure remains low for most species despite well-documented pH and oxygen declines and strengthening upwelling in the central portions of the California Current. Seasonal biases of data collection and sparse observations near the benthos and at depths where organisms most frequently experience stressful conditions undermine exposure estimates. Herein we provide concrete examples of how pink shrimp and Dungeness crab fisheries may be impacted by our findings, and provide suggestions for incorporating oceanographic data into management plans. By limiting our scope to California waters and assessing the limitations presented by current monitoring coverage, this study aims to provide a granular, actionable framework that policymakers and managers can build from to prioritize targeted enhancements and sustained funding of oceanographic monitoring recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.