ArticlePloS one2025
Top-down effects on translucency perception in relation to shape cues.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is well established that object shape perception significantly influences the perception of translucency. However, how object shape cues such as motion and binocular disparity affect the perception of translucency in rich environments, like virtual reality or real visual environments, remains unclear. This study aims to psychophysically measure the extent to which multiple object shape cues influence the perception of translucency. Additionally, we examined whether top-down factors, such as changes in cognitive attitude caused by the sequence of experiments, affect translucency perception. The results revealed that while motion and binocular disparity enhance translucency perception, this effect is confined to situations where shape cues are poor. Moreover, the effect became particularly pronounced when the experiments began with weak specular reflection stimuli, followed by the experiments using stimuli with specular reflection. In the case of translucent objects without specular reflection, strong shape information cannot be derived solely from shading patterns. These findings thus suggest that top-down factors related to shape modulate the influence of shape cues on translucency perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.