ArticlePloS one2025
Inverse association between prognostic nutritional index and kidney stone prevalence: A population-based study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Unraveling Metabolic Syndrome in Youth: The Obesity Epidemic's Hidden Complication.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKidney stones frequently occur due to metabolic disorders, dietary habits, and lifestyle influences. The Prognostic Nutritional Index, which reflects an individual's nutritional condition, might be associated with kidney stone prevalence. This study examines the association between PNI and kidney stone prevalence in US adults.
methodsThe study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database from 2009-2018 and excluded pregnant women, and individuals who lacked data on kidney stones, or had incomplete Prognostic Nutritional Index data. Independent associations between Prognostic Nutritional Index and kidney stones were investigated by multivariate logistic regression and subgroup analyses, in addition to exploring nonlinear associations using smoothed curves and threshold effects.
resultsA total of 13,835 participants aged ≥ 20 years were included, with a kidney stone prevalence of 8.48%. An inverse association was observed between the Prognostic Nutritional Index and kidney stone prevalence (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.96-0.98, P < 0.001). This relationship was not significantly modified by race, education, marital status, or comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. However, sex and total cholesterol levels influenced the association. Stratified analysis showed a significant negative association in men (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.96-0.99, P = 0.031), but not in women. A nonlinear relationship was identified in individuals with total cholesterol ≥ 5.2 mmol/L, with a significant negative association below the inflection point of 57 (OR = 0.96, P = 0.012) and a positive association above it (OR = 1.11, P = 0.03). These findings suggest that the Prognostic Nutritional Index is inversely associated with kidney stones, particularly in men and those with high cholesterol levels.
conclusionThe Prognostic Nutritional Index was negatively associated with the risk of kidney stones, particularly in men and individuals with high cholesterol levels below the identified inflection point, suggesting that tailored nutritional management may be crucial for these subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.