ArticlePloS one2025
Changes in vaginal Ureaplasma and Lactobacillus due to antibiotic regimen for premature rupture of membranes.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agent, Dose and Duration: The Unanswered Questions Behind Latency Antibiotic Therapy for Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Ureaplasma urealyticum infections among reproductive-age adults in Shantou, China: a retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is associated with preterm delivery and neonatal complications. PPROM is often complicated by intra-amniotic inflammation and/or microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity with Ureaplasma or Mycoplasma. Various prophylactic antibiotic therapies have been proposed to prolong latency between PPROM and delivery, reduce the risk of clinical chorioamnionitis, and improve neonatal complications. However, information on the potential of azithromycin administration to reduce the microbial load of vaginal Ureaplasma and Mycoplasma remains lacking. This prospective cohort study included singleton pregnancies managed with prophylactic antibiotics for PPROM at less than 36 weeks of gestation. All patients received the standard antibiotic regimen for PPROM, which consisted of a single oral azithromycin and intravenous ampicillin every for 2 days followed by 5 days of oral amoxicillin. Vaginal swabs samples were collected when PPROM was confirmed and after the antibiotic regimen administration. The main outcome measures were to investigate the changes in vaginal Ureaplasma, Mycoplasma, and Lactobacillus spp. due to the antibiotic regimen. In addition, the association between the presence and changes in vaginal Ureaplasma and Mycoplasma, pregnancy outcomes, and neonatal complications were examined. Out of 82 eligible PPROM, 51 had positive vaginal Ureaplasma. Thirty-six patients (52.2%) completed the antibiotic regimen. Among those with positive vaginal Ureaplasma who completed the antibiotic regimen, 75% experienced an increase in vaginal Ureaplasma levels. For those who delivered before completing all antibiotic doses, 40% had increased vaginal Ureaplasma levels. Furthermore, the antibiotic regimen resulted in decreased Lactobacillus spp. in almost all cases. It was suggested that azithromycin and ampicillin may not be effective when targeting Ureaplasma or Mycoplasma. Since this study did not search for resistance genes, it cannot be determined that azithromycin resistance in Ureaplasma or Mycoplasma is responsible for the present results. In addition, vaginal Ureaplasma changes were not found to be associated with neonatal sepsis or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Future studies are needed to revalidate current antibiotic therapy for PPROM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.