Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39964987›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

Effect of using home-based dynamic intermittent pneumatic compression therapy during periods of physical activity on functional and vascular health outcomes in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

James Faulkner, Eloise Paine, Nick Hudson, Scott Hannah, Amy Dennis-Jones, Louis Martinelli, Helen Hobbs

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James FaulknerPrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3704-6737
Eloise PaineDepartment of Sport, Allied Health Professions and Social Work, University of Winchester, Winchester, United Kingdom.
Nick HudsonDepartment of Sport, Allied Health Professions and Social Work, University of Winchester, Winchester, United Kingdom.
Scott HannahDepartment of Sport, Allied Health Professions and Social Work, University of Winchester, Winchester, United Kingdom.
Amy Dennis-JonesHobbs Rehabilitation, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Louis MartinelliHobbs Rehabilitation, Winchester, United Kingdom.
Helen HobbsHobbs Rehabilitation, Winchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) therapy may benefit stroke patients by eliciting more intensive training sessions that may result in better health, mobility and ultimately quality of life. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the effect of using a home-based IPC device on functional outcomes and vascular health in individuals with chronic stroke.

methodsThirty-one stroke survivors (64.3 ± 14.3y; 4.3 ± 2.7y since stroke) completed pre- and post-intervention assessments of functional capacity (six-minute walk test [6MWT], timed-up-and-go, 10m walk test), vascular health (pulse wave analysis, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity), and physical activity. Following the pre-assessment, individuals were randomly assigned to either a daily, 12-week, home-based IPC group, or to a usual care control (CON) group. Outcomes were assessed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), controlling for age and any baseline differences.

resultsFollowing ANCOVA, a significant increase in 6MWT walking distance was observed post-assessment for the IPC (Mean ±  SD [95%CI]; 188 ±  19 m [177-199m]) but not the CON group (167 ±  19 m [157-178m]) (p <  0.05). A significant reduction in peripheral systolic blood pressure was reported at the post-assessment for the IPC group (136.2 ±  8.0 mmHg [131.9-140.4 mmHg]) but not for CON (142.2 ±  8.0 mmHg [138.1-144.6 mmHg]) (p <  0.05). Similar findings were observed for central systolic blood pressure. Physical activity levels significantly increased at the post-assessment for IPC (1857 ±  879 MET·min-1·week-1 [1390-2325 MET·min-1·week-1]) but not for the CON group (1161 ± 879 MET·min-1·week-1 [677-1645 MET·min-1·week-1]), while for time spent sitting, a significantly greater reduction was observed at the post-assessment for the IPC group (396 ±  86 mins [350-442 mins]) compared to CON (486 ± 86 mins [439-534 mins]) (both p <  0.05).

conclusionsThe observed improvements in functional mobility, cardiovascular health, increased physical activity and reduced sedentary time demonstrates important clinical implications of 'home-based' IPC therapy as a clinical training aid for stroke rehabilitation. Home-based IPC therapy could serve as an adjunct to conventional rehabilitation, however, further research is needed to determine whether IPC therapy can sustain or improve function over time for individuals in the chronic stage of recovery.

Indexed as

ExerciseIntermittent Pneumatic Compression DevicesStrokeStroke RehabilitationAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulse Wave AnalysisQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeWalking

Identifiers

PMID39964987
PMCPMC11835336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.