Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39964738›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Visual homogeneity computations in the brain enable solving property-based visual tasks.

Georgin Jacob, R T Pramod, S P Arun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Georgin JacobCentre for Neuroscience & Department of Electrical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8262-0155
R T PramodCentre for Neuroscience & Department of Electrical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5933-7893
S P ArunCentre for Neuroscience & Department of Electrical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9602-5066

Funding

MHRD Senior Research FellowshipWellcome TrustWellcome Trust DBT India Alliance IA/S/17/1/503081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most visual tasks involve looking for specific object features. But we also often perform property-based tasks where we look for specific property in an image, such as finding an odd item, deciding if two items are same, or if an object has symmetry. How do we solve such tasks? These tasks do not fit into standard models of decision making because their underlying feature space and decision process is unclear. Using well-known principles governing multiple object representations, we show that displays with repeating elements can be distinguished from heterogeneous displays using a property we define as visual homogeneity. In behavior, visual homogeneity predicted response times on visual search, same-different and symmetry tasks. Brain imaging during visual search and symmetry tasks revealed that visual homogeneity was localized to a region in the object-selective cortex. Thus, property-based visual tasks are solved in a localized region in the brain by computing visual homogeneity.

Indexed as

BrainPattern Recognition, VisualVisual PerceptionAdultBrain MappingDecision MakingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung Adulthigh-level visionhumanneuroscienceobject categorizationobject perceptionsame differentsymmetryvisual search

Identifiers

PMID39964738
PMCPMC11835389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.