ArticleBlood advances2025
Comparison of outcomes in postinduction strategies for primary central nervous system lymphoma: a Mayo Clinic experience.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Penpulimab combined with rituximab, high-dose methotrexate, and cytarabine (Pen-RMA) in newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL): a phase 2 trial.Blood cancer journal · 2026Trial
- Primary central nervous system lymphoma-current standards and recent developments.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Review
- Primary Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of the Central Nervous System and Systemic Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Same Patient.Journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Consolidation reduced-dose whole-brain radiation therapy with response-adapted boost in older patients with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Prognostic significance of POD24 in primary central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Translating advances in primary central nervous system lymphoma: from prognostic stratification to treatment innovation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Non-DLBCL monomorphic and Hodgkin lymphoma PTLD: clinical insights and treatment strategies.Blood advances · 2025Review
- A nomogram for predicting the diagnosis of central malignant tumors based on preoperative clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators: a diagnostic study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
- Padlock-designed MOFs triggers an "avalanche effect" to enhance apoptosis and suppress metastasis in central nervous system lymphoma.Science advances · 2025Article
- Review
- Role of Radiotherapy in PCNSL within the Current Therapeutic Landscape: a Comprehensive Review.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- Ibrutinib combined with rituximab and high-dose methotrexate in newly diagnosed primary CNS diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a pilot study with long-term follow-up.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The prognostic role of surgical resection in selected patients with primary CNS lymphoma based on voxel-wise analysis.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractPrimary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma involving the brain, cerebrospinal fluid, or retina/vitreous without systemic involvement. Induction with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) has become the standard treatment paradigm for most patients. However, limited data are available regarding the efficacy of a maintenance approach with HD-MTX. Herein, we retrospectively reviewed the characteristics and outcomes of 148 patients diagnosed with PCNSL between October 2010 and June 2022, who underwent HD-MTX-based induction therapy followed by either auto-SCT consolidation (n = 70) or HD-MTX maintenance therapy (n = 37). At a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, the progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.3 years and the overall survival (OS) was not reached. Compared to patients who underwent auto-SCT, patients who received maintenance HD-MTX had a higher median age at diagnosis of 72 vs 62 years and a trend toward higher proportion of patients being Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 2 or higher (41% vs 29%). At 5-years postinduction treatment initiation, the PFS rates in the auto-SCT cohort and HD-MTX maintenance cohort were 74.6% and 72.6%, respectively, and the OS rates were 76.0% and 82.4%, respectively. Overall, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS based on postinduction management strategy. Our data suggest that maintenance HD-MTX may be a reasonable, time-limited treatment strategy for patients with PCNSL responding to initial induction therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.