Trial reportJAMA network open2025
Chlorhexidine vs Routine Foot Washing to Prevent Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03503370 (Preventing Diabetic Foot Ulcers Through Manipulating the Skin Microbiota), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Preventing Diabetic Foot Ulcers Through Manipulating the Skin Microbiota
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Daily Chlorhexidine Foot Cleansing Reduces Staphylococcal Burden on the Feet of People with Prior Diabetic Foot Complications.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Beyond clinical closure: functional skin barrier recovery to prevent diabetic foot ulcer recurrence: a narrative review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicle Therapies for Diabetic Skin Lesions: Mechanisms, Engineering, and Clinical Translation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Development of a Patient-Centered Daily Foot Self-Care Protocol for High-Risk Diabetic Foot Patients Based on Checklist Management Model: A Delphi Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Error in Figure 3.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Foot ulcers are a common and feared complication for people with diabetes because 20% of foot ulcers become infected and lead to a lower extremity amputation. Objective: To evaluate the effect of daily foot care using chlorhexidine wipes vs soap-and-water wipes for 1 year on the risk of developing new foot complications in veterans with diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Baltimore Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center between January 2019 to January 2023. Veterans were eligible if they had a diabetes diagnosis, were at high risk for diabetic foot complications, were ambulatory, had both feet, and did not have a current foot infection. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either soap-and-water wipes (control group) or 2% chlorhexidine wipes (chlorhexidine group). Intention-to-treat data analysis was conducted from October 5, 2023, to April 24, 2024. Intervention: Daily use of a 2% chlorhexidine wipe or a soap-and-water wipe on the feet for 1 year. Wipes were nearly identical in color, size, shape, thickness, feel, and scent. Both chlorhexidine and control groups received the same lotion for application on the feet after wipe use and education on foot self-care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time in days from randomization to new foot complication, including chronic foot ulcer, foot infection, or foot amputation. Results: A total of 175 participants (170 males [97%]; mean [SD] age at enrollment, 68 [9] years; 1 Asian [1%], 117 Black or African American [67%], 53 White [30%] individuals) were randomly assigned to the chlorhexidine group (n = 88) or the control group (n = 87). Twelve participants (14%) in the chlorhexidine group and 14 participants (16%) in the control group developed a new foot complication within 1 year. Median (IQR) time from randomization to development of a new foot complication was 232 (115-315) days. The reduction in hazard of new foot complications in the chlorhexidine group compared with the control group was not significant (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.39-1.80). The intervention was well tolerated, with 145 participants (83%) continuing it over the study period. Sixty adverse events occurred, but none was related to the study products or procedures. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that daily use of chlorhexidine wipes for foot washing for 1 year did not lead to a significant reduction in the risk of new foot complications compared with daily use of soap-and-water wipes. The intervention was well tolerated, and the trial provides important lessons for future studies on diabetic foot ulcer prevention. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03503370.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.