Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39964681›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Pulmonary Embolism-Related Mortality in Patients With Cancer.

Marco Zuin, Anju Nohria, Stanislav Henkin, Darsiya Krishnathasan, Alyssa Sato, Gregory Piazza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The effect of COVID-19 pandemic on admission, management and mortality of pulmonary embolism in cancer patients.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marco ZuinDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Anju NohriaCardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stanislav HenkinGonda Vascular Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Darsiya KrishnathasanThrombosis Research Group, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alyssa SatoThrombosis Research Group, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gregory PiazzaThrombosis Research Group, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer in the US and worldwide. Objectives: To assess the trends in PE-related mortality from 2011 to 2020 among US patients with cancer across age, sex, ethnic and racial groups, urbanicity, and regionality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research data system to determine national trends in age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) due to acute PE among US patients with cancer aged 15 years or older from January 2011 to December 2020. Concomitant trends in cancer mortality and incidence that may have contributed to PE-related mortality were obtained from US Cancer Statistics. Data were analyzed from September to November 2024. Exposure: PE-related mortality. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was PE-related deaths among individuals with cancer. AAMRs and cancer incidence were assessed using joinpoint regression modeling, expressed as an average annual percentage change (AAPC) with relative 95% CIs. Results: From 2011 to 2020, a total of 27 280 194 individuals aged 15 years or older (13 897 519 male [50.9%]; 13 382 675 female [49.1%]) died in the US. The AAMR for PE-related mortality in patients with cancer increased during this time period (AAPC, 2.5%; 95% CI, 1.4% to 3.6%; P = .001), without differences between sexes (P for parallelism = .38). The AAMR increased among those aged 15 to 64 years (AAPC, 3.2%; 95% CI, 1.9% to 4.6%; P = .001), non-Hispanic and non-Latinx White individuals (AAPC, 2.7%; 95% CI, 1.52% to 3.94%; P = .001), non-Hispanic and non-Latinx Black or African American individuals (AAPC, 2.2%; 95% CI, 0.7% to 3.7%; P = .001), Hispanic and Latinx individuals (AAPC, 2.6%; 95% CI, 0.7% to 4.5%; P = .006), and among individuals residing in the Southern US (AAPC, 3.7%; 95% CI, 1.3% to 6.2%; P = .003). During the same period, age-adjusted cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality decreased while the absolute number of new cancer diagnoses and cancer-related deaths increased. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that despite decreases in cancer-related mortality rates, age-adjusted PE-related mortality in US patients with cancer increased over the last decade; concerning trends included rising PE-related mortality in younger individuals aged 15 to 64 years, particular ethnic and racial groups, and the Southern region of the US. Recognition of such patterns may inform further research into thromboprophylaxis and treatment of PE as a complication of cancer and cancer-directed therapy.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPulmonary EmbolismAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39964681
PMCPMC11836760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.