Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39964677›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Bayesian Hierarchical Penalized Spline Models for Immediate and Time-Varying Intervention Effects in Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials.

Danni Wu, Hyung G Park, Corita R Grudzen, Keith S Goldfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danni WuDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6989-735X
Hyung G ParkDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Corita R GrudzenDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Keith S GoldfeldDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0292-8780

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Project-005UL1TR001445 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2015 to 2025
$103.5M
NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory-Coordinating Center (U24)U24AT009676 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LESLEY H CURTIS, Adrian Hernandez · 2017 to 2026
$21.5M
Primary Palliative Care for Emergency MedicineUG3AT009844 · NCCIH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GRUDZEN, CORITA R · 2018 to 2018
$984k
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center P30CA008748NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001445NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009676NCCIH NIH HHS UG3 AT009844NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIH HHS UG3AT009844NIH HHS UL1TR001445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SWCRTs) often face challenges related to potential confounding by time. Traditional frequentist methods may not provide adequate coverage of an intervention's true effect using confidence intervals, whereas Bayesian approaches show potential for better coverage of intervention effects. However, Bayesian methods remain underexplored in the context of SWCRTs. To bridge this gap, we propose two innovative Bayesian hierarchical penalized spline models. Our first model accommodates large numbers of clusters and time periods, focusing on immediate intervention effects. To evaluate this approach, we compared this model to traditional frequentist methods. We then extend our approach to account for time-varying intervention effects, conducting a comprehensive comparison with an existing Bayesian monotone effect curve model and alternative frequentist methods. The proposed models were applied in the Primary Palliative Care for Emergency Medicine stepped wedge trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Through extensive simulations and real-world application, we demonstrate the robustness of our proposed Bayesian models. Notably, the Bayesian immediate effect model consistently achieves the nominal coverage probability, providing more reliable interval estimations while maintaining high estimation accuracy. Furthermore, our proposed Bayesian time-varying effect model represents a significant advancement over the existing Bayesian monotone effect curve model, offering improved accuracy and reliability in estimation while also achieving higher coverage probability than alternative frequentist methods. To the best of our knowledge, this marks the first development of Bayesian hierarchical spline modeling for SWCRTs. Our proposed models offer promising tools for researchers and practitioners, enabling more precise evaluation of intervention impacts.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBayes TheoremCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationHumansPalliative CareTime FactorsBayesian hierarchical modelscluster randomized trialpenalized splinestepped wedgetime‐varying treatment effect

Identifiers

PMID39964677
PMCPMC11835049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.