ArticleJournal of medical systems2025
Electronic Prescribing in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Analysis of Prescribing Errors and Risk Factors.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global Prevalence and Associated Factors of Medication Errors in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients admitted to neonatal intensive care units are up to eight times more likely to experience medication errors than patients admitted to adult intensive care units. Prescribing errors account for up to 74% of medication errors. Electronic prescribing has been postulated as a tool to reduce errors. The objective was to analyse prescribing errors with the e-prescribing system and risk factors. All patients who were admitted for at least 24 h and who received active pharmacological treatment during the study period were included. Prescriptions were made using electronic assisted prescription software integrated into the medical record system. Treatment was reviewed daily by a pharmacist, and errors were graded according to taxonomic criteria. A total of 240 patients were included, 13,876 prescriptions were reviewed and 455 errors were found (3.3% of prescriptions were wrong). Prescribing errors were concentrated in 40 drugs/nutritional products. The most frequent error was a discrepancy between the prescription and the associated text-free field (n = 196). The drugs with the most errors were Lactobacillus acidophilus, caffeine citrate, acetaminophen, gentamycin and cholecalciferol. Patients with a birth weight from 1000 to 1500 g were 82% more likely to experience an error than those with an extremely low birth weight (< 1000 g) (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.42-2.89, p < 0.05). Patients at the highest risk were those with gestational ages from 28 to 32 weeks, with a 29.80% greater risk of prescribing errors than those with gestational ages less than 28 weeks (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02-1.65, p < 0.05). Prescribing errors occur due to complex dosing rules based on patient characteristics and free-text use, highlighting process issues rather than specific medication risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39964641What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.