ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
Mechanical enhancement of hydroxyapatite via carbon and boron nitride nanotubes: a molecular dynamics study.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermal shock resistance of various two-dimensional materials: a comparative analysis.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Application of Hydroxyapatite Composites in Bone Tissue Engineering: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThis study explores the mechanical limitations of hydroxyapatite (HAP), a critical bioceramic in bone tissue engineering and orthopedic implants, which is limited by its brittleness and low mechanical strength. By reinforcing HAP with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs), the mechanical performance of HAP was significantly enhanced. The inclusion of CNTs led to a 25% increase in ultimate tensile strength (UTS), peaking at 9.18 GPa, while BNNTs improved ductility with a maximum UTS of 8.75 GPa. Toughness, representing the material's energy absorption capacity, reached 15.8 kJ/m
methodsThe study employed molecular dynamics simulations to model and analyze the mechanical behavior of nano-reinforced HAP. Simulations were performed using the LAMMPS software, with the CVFF-Interface Force Field for HAP and the AIREBO potential used to model carbon interactions in CNTs. BNNTs were simulated using the Tersoff potential to account for interactions between boron and nitrogen atoms. The effects of nano-reinforcements on the mechanical properties of HAP were evaluated through tensile stress-strain curves, which quantified improvements in Young's modulus, ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and strain at UTS. Additionally, combinations of CNTs and BNNTs in varying ratios were simulated to assess synergistic interactions, while different inclusion levels were investigated to understand their impact on the composite's mechanical performance. Toughness values, representing the material's energy absorption capacity, were calculated by integrating the area under the stress-strain curves up to failure, providing deeper insights into the ductility and energy dissipation characteristics of the reinforced HAP composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39964639What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.