ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025
A novel formula to improve the accuracy and prognostic ability of determining the survival time after recurrent breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent breast cancer (BC) has poor prognosis. To ascertain the survival time after recurrence (STR) is necessary for improving QOL and for selecting appropriate treatment. An investigation was conducted to determine whether certain biomarkers would improve prognosis and whether the disease-free interval (DFI) and biomarkers can predict STR.
methodsCases (n = 1,254) with recurrent BC from January 2000 to December 2023 were enrolled in this study. The cases were divided into the 2000-2005 group (n = 182), 2006-2011 group (n = 331), 2012-2017 group (n = 369), and 2018-2023 group (n = 366). A simple linear regression model was used to identify the relationship between STR and DFI.
resultsSurvival rates after recurrence significantly increased in cases after 2012. No improvement was observed in cases with a HER2-0 status and a Ki-67 index value < 15%. A multivariate analysis revealed that the Ki-67 index value was a significant factor in the 2000-2005 group. The ER and HER2 status were significant after 2012. The most significant correlation was found between DFI and STR in deceased patients with a Ki-67 index value > 30%, followed by HER2-low, tumor size ≤ 2 cm and ER < 1%. The following formula was developed to predict STR;
Indexed as
Identifiers
39964590What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.