Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39964586›Full record

Observational studyOral and maxillofacial surgery2025

Comparative analysis of lip morphology in Brazilian caucasian individuals between 20 and 50 years old using stereophotogrammetry.

Karolyn Sales Fioravanti, Maria Gabriela Robles Mengoa, Laura Vidoto Paludetto, Guilherme Yukio Arakaki Murayama, Thaís Marchini Oliveira, Chiarella Sforza, Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek, Simone Soares

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Digital Workflow for the Restoration of the Vertical Dimension of Occlusion Evaluated by 3D Stereophotogrammetry.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karolyn Sales FioravantiDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6841-6414
Maria Gabriela Robles MengoaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0286-2582
Laura Vidoto PaludettoDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.
Guilherme Yukio Arakaki MurayamaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.
Thaís Marchini OliveiraDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Public Health, Bauru School of Dentistry and Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3460-3144
Chiarella SforzaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.
Karin Hermana NeppelenbroekDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7086-2667
Simone SoaresDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Bauru School of Dentistry and Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil. sisoares@usp.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0811-7302

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2016/14942-6Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/10978-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/11144-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis observational, cross-sectional study evaluated healthy Caucasian Brazilian individuals' normal lip dimensions according to sex and age (20-50 years) using stereophotogrammetry.

methodsA total of 130 individuals divided into four groups according to sex and age were analyzed using stereophotogrammetry. Ten linear lip, five angular lip, and three lip surface measurements (upper, lower, and total lip vermilion) were obtained. Comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA.

resultsMouth width, philtrum width, and lower lip cutaneous height were significantly greater in men than women. The upper lip height, upper lip cutaneous height, and average lower vermilion lip angle were significantly larger in men than women and increased with age (group), with medium or large effect sizes. A sex × group interaction was present for total vermilion height, upper vermilion height, total lip height, lower lip height, average upper vermilion lip angle, average Cupid's bow angle, mentolabial angle, and upper and total vermilion lip areas. When factors interact (sex/group), one affects the outcome of the other.

conclusionsRelevant linear lip measures were greater in men than women and increased with age in a mixed population from 20 to 50 years old. Thus, the lip and mouth are severly impacted by aging.

Indexed as

LipPhotogrammetryAdultAge FactorsBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesSex FactorsWhite PeopleYoung AdultAgingEstheticsFaceImagingLipPhotogrammetryThree-Dimensional

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.