ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2025
Exposome Burden Scores to Summarize Environmental Chemical Mixtures: Creating a Fair and Common Scale for Cross-study Harmonization, Report-back and Precision Environmental Health.
Review in Current environmental health reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- LIFETIME JEM-DERIVED OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE BURDEN AND ODDS OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE AND PARKINSONISM IN A MATCHED CASE-CONTROL STUDY.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Quantifying PFAS-Omics Burden Scores for Nontargeted Analysis Using Multidimensional Item Response Theory: An Exploratory Analysis of Novel and Legacy PFAS in Cord Blood.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewEnvironmental health researchers are increasingly concerned about characterizing exposure to environmental chemical mixtures (co-exposure to multiple chemicals simultaneously). We discuss approaches for quantifying an overall summary score or index that reflects an individual's total exposure burden to components of the mixture. We focus on unsupervised methods, in which the summary score is not computed in relation to a pre-specified health outcome. RECENT
findingsSum-scores and principal components analysis (PCA) are common approaches for quantifying a total exposure burden metric but have several limitations: 1) they require imputation when using exposure biomarkers with high frequency of non-detection, 2) they do not account for exposure heterogeneity, 3) sum-scores assume the same measurement error for all people, while there is no error term inherent to the PCA model as its primary purpose is dimension reduction, and 4) in pooled analyses, both approaches are limited to analyzing the set of exposure variables that are in common across all studies, potentially discarding valuable information. Meanwhile, item response theory (IRT) is a novel and promising alternative to calculate an exposure burden score that addresses the above limitations. It allows for the inclusion of exposure analytes with high frequency of non-detects without the need for imputation. It can account for exposure heterogeneity to calculate fair metrics for all people, through assessment of differential item functioning and mixture IRT. IRT also quantifies measurement errors of the exposure burden score that are individual-specific, such that it appropriately assigns a larger standard error to an individual who has missing data on one or more exposure variables. Lastly, IRT enhances cross-study harmonization by enabling the creation of exposure burden calculators to set a common scale across studies, and allows for the inclusion of all exposure variables within a chemical class, even if they were only measured in a subset of participants. Summarizing total exposure burden, through the creation of fair and informative index scores, is a promising tool for environmental health research as environmental exposures are increasingly used for biomonitoring and clinical recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.