Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39964566›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2025

Application of Modular Architectures in the Medical Domain - a Scoping Review.

Franziska Bathelt, Stephan Lorenz, Jens Weidner, Martin Sedlmayr, Ines Reinecke

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Franziska BatheltThiem-Research GmbH, Thiemstraße 111, 03048, Cottbus, Brandenburg, Germany. f.bathelt@mul-ct.de.
Stephan LorenzCarl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Center for Medical Informatics, Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Jens WeidnerCarl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Center for Medical Informatics, Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Martin SedlmayrCarl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Center for Medical Informatics, Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Ines ReineckeCarl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Center for Medical Informatics, Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01KX2121,01ZZ2101A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The healthcare sector is notable for its reliance on discrete, self-contained information systems, which are often characterised by the presence of disparate data silos. The growing demands for documentation, quality assurance, and secondary use of medical data for research purposes has underscored the necessity for solutions that are more flexible, straightforward to maintain and interoperable. In this context, modular systems have the potential to act as a catalyst for change, offering the capacity to encapsulate and combine functionalities in an adaptable manner. The objective of this scoping review is to determine the extent to which modular systems are employed in the medical field. The review will provide a detailed overview of the effectiveness of service-oriented or microservice architectures, the challenges that should be addressed during implementation, and the lessons that can be learned from countries with productive use of such modular architectures. The review shows a rise in the use of microservices, indicating a shift towards encapsulated autonomous functions. The implementation should use HL7 FHIR as communication standard, deploy RESTful interfaces and standard protocols for technical data exchange, and apply HIPAA security rule for security purposes. User involvement is essential, as is integrating services into existing workflows. Modular architectures can facilitate flexibility and scalability. However, there are well-documented performance issues associated with microservice architectures, namely a high communication demand. One potential solution to this problem may be to integrate modular architectures into a cloud computing environment, which would require further investigation.

Indexed as

Information SystemsComputer SecurityHumansHealthcareHealth information interoperabilityMicroserviceScalabilityService-oriented architecture

Identifiers

PMID39964566
PMCPMC11835905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.