ReviewOncology and therapy2025
Oncological Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An Update and Critical Review.
Review in Oncology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinicopathologic Determinants of Overall Survival in Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A SEER-Based Population Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Ki-67 as a Predictor of Metastasis in Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Artificial Intelligence Insights from Retrospective Imaging Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adrenocortical carcinoma is a very rare cancer that commonly presents with hormonal abnormalities or, more rarely, as an incidental finding of an adrenal mass. Following optimal surgical management, ideally in the form of open adrenalectomy, meta-analyses show that adjuvant mitotane significantly increases recurrence-free and overall survival (HR 0.62 and 0.69 respectively) and tumour bed radiotherapy reduces locoregional recurrence and overall survival for higher risk cancers by at least 40-50%. Those with recurrent or metastatic cancers can be considered for the combination of etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin and mitotane (EDP-M) on the basis of results of a single randomised trial. There are significant pharmacological interactions within this regime that have yet to be satisfactorily addressed. Patients of borderline performance status may be treated with various modifications of this regime. More recent approaches with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapy (TT), either alone or in combination, show some promise, but progression-free survival for the majority of regimes does not exceed 6 months. Cabozantinib or lenvatinib alone or in combination, show the greatest promise with disease control rates of 50% or greater, and progression-free survival in excess of 6 months. Studies combining ICIs and TT as a means of overcoming the immunosuppressive environment are ongoing. There are several ongoing clinical trials in this area although only a small proportion of patients may be able to access these. Local therapies with radiotherapy, thermal ablation or arterial embolisation may be helpful for selected patients, particularly those with oligometastatic disease or those with symptomatic metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.