ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
The suture effect of butterfly suture combined with the looped, broad, and deep buried suture in patients with pigmented naevus receiving surgery excision.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to explore the suture effectiveness of butterfly suture combined the looped, broad, and deep buried suture (butterfly tension-reducing suture) in patients with pigmented naevus. A retrospective analysis of patients with pigmented naevus from January 2021 to December 2022 were performed. Patients were divided into: (1) control group that received routine suture; (2) observation group receiving butterfly tension-reducing suture. The ratio of scar area to the naevus area, the scar width and the incision complication were investigated. Vancouver Scar Scale scores of patients (VSS), Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) and the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS) at pre-operation and 6 months after surgery were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used for the risk factor analysis of post-operative scars. The study included 34 in control group and 41 in observation group. Observation group showed a lower incidence of incision complication and smaller scar width. At 6 months after surgery, VSS items showed statistical changes between the control and observation group, including pigmentation, vascularity, pliability, height, and total opinion. Using PSAS, observation group showed lower scores in color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, pain, itch, and overall opinion as compared to control group. There were significant decreases in OSAS items of the observation group compared to the control group, including vascularity, thickness, pigmentation, pliability, relief, and overall opinion. Suture method and incision complication were the risk factors of post-operative scars. Butterfly tension-reducing suture improves aesthetics and prognosis in pigmented naevus patients by inhibiting extension excessive tension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39964514What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.