Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39964512›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2025

Clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in CNS fungal infections: a single-center retrospective data analysis.

I Masouris, M Klein, C Schichor, J Stemmler, U Koedel, H W Pfister

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Diagnostic challenges and treatment breakthroughs inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

I MasourisDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Marchioninistr. 15, D-81377, Munich, Germany. Ilias.Masouris@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6926-0527
M KleinDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Marchioninistr. 15, D-81377, Munich, Germany.
C SchichorDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
J StemmlerDepartment of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
U KoedelDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Marchioninistr. 15, D-81377, Munich, Germany.
H W PfisterDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Marchioninistr. 15, D-81377, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCentral nervous system (CNS) involvement is a rare but serious complication of fungal infection with increasing incidence, especially in immunocompromised patients. Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp. Aspergillus spp. and Mucorales spp. are the most common pathogens. Despite continuous advancement, diagnosing remains challenging. This can lead to significant delays in diagnosis and therapy, thereby negatively affecting outcomes. To date, data on clinical symptoms, diagnostics and treatment of CNS fungal infections remain scarce.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from patients ≥ 18 years old with CNS fungal infection treated between 01/01/2007 and 31/12/2023 in the Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Oncology at the University Hospital of LMU, Munich. Data included biometrical data, clinical symptoms, laboratory and microbiological results, brain imaging, treatment, and clinical course.

results58 patients with CNS fungal infections were identified. Our key findings were: (1) the most common fungus was Aspergillus spp, followed by Cryptococcus spp, Mucoracae spp and Candida spp; (2) clinical symptoms and immunosuppressive factors varied between pathogens; (3) candidiasis and cryptococcosis mostly manifested as meningitis, while mucormycosis and aspergillosis presented as mass lesions; (4) time to diagnosis was longer for Candidiasis patients than for other fungal infections; (5) antifungal regimens varied among and within each CNS fungal infection; (6) two-year-survival was substantial for candidiasis and cryptococcosis but worse for aspergillosis and mucormycosis.

conclusionsOverall, patients with clinical suspicion of neuroinfection and neurologic deficits should be examined for fungal infections, especially if immunocompromised. Given their increasing frequency, CNS fungal infections will become more relevant in daily neurological practice.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCentral Nervous System Fungal InfectionsAdultAgedAspergillusBrainCandidaCryptococcusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMucoralesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntifungal AgentsCNSFungal infections

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.