ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Effects of citizen involvement and participation in knowledge processes of integrated municipal health promotion: a systematic scoping review].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Participatory health research and promotion with children in Germany: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- The development process of a regional dementia strategy: a Delphi study and deliberative dialogues.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParticipation and its preliminary stages are recognized requirements in various fields of public health. By means of a scoping review, the impact of participation and its preliminary stages of residents in knowledge-generating processes in integrated municipal health promotion are systematically investigated and presented.
methodsThe scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA framework and extended by systematic manual research. An analysis grid was developed based on the impact model of community-based participatory research and the PHINEO impact model.
resultsIn total, 30 publications from six subprojects of research alliances (also publications across research consortia) and six independent projects were analysed. Impact was mostly shown regarding positive changes in awareness and skills for the residents and stakeholder that were directly involved. To a smaller extent, impact was also reported for residents and stakeholders that did not participate in the projects. Changes in conditions and life circumstance for residents resulted from changes in the awareness and actions of the stakeholders involved in the projects. DISCUSSION: The impact of participation and its preliminary stages of residents in knowledge-generating processes of integrated municipal health promotion is broad and exceeds the target group of the (sub)project. At the same time, impact going beyond the directly involved residents or stakeholders is rarely described. Adequate funding and resources are necessary to systematically facilitate, evaluate and disseminate participatory knowledge-generating processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.