Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39964413›Full record

ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026

Gut Microbiota and Postbiotic Metabolites: Biotic Intervention for Enhancing Vaccine Responses and Personalized Medicine for Disease Prevention.

Naheed Mojgani, Sumel Ashique, Mehran Moradi, Masoumeh Bagheri, Ashish Garg, Monika Kaushik, Md Sadique Hussain, Sabina Yasmin, Mohammad Yousuf Ansari

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Harnessing PANoptosis for Innate Immune Response.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Pharmaceutics · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naheed Mojgani *Biotechnology Department, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute- Agricultural Research, karaj, Iran.
Sumel Ashique *School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, 144411, India. ashiquesumel007@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4362-2830
Mehran MoradiDepartment of Food Hygiene and Quality Control, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Masoumeh BagheriBiotechnology Department, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute- Agricultural Research, karaj, Iran.
Ashish GargGuru Ramdas Khalsa Institute of Science and Technology, Pharmacy, Jabalpur, M.P, 483001, India.
Monika KaushikAmity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, 474005, Maharajpura, Gwalior, India.
Md Sadique HussainUttaranchal Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248007, India.
Sabina YasminDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, 62529, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Yousuf AnsariMM College of Pharmacy, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to Be University), Mullana, Ambala Haryana, 133207, India. yousufniper@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6365-7104

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University RGP .2 /244/45
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The creation of vaccines has revolutionized several aspects of the game in the fight against transmissible diseases, protecting countless individuals around the globe. Several vaccines against potentially fatal diseases such as diphtheria, pertussis, polio, measles, tetanus, influenza, and smallpox have significantly reduced disease risks and successfully immunized individuals against these serious health threats. The immune response generated by vaccination plays a crucial role in mitigating disease risks by stimulating the production of specific antibodies targeting the relevant pathogens. However, the efficacy of vaccines can vary among communities and people due to several factors, including heredity, age, sex, and preexisting health conditions. The multitude of microbes that call the human digestive tract the microbiota have a pivotal role in regulating immunological reactions to immunization, according to mounting data from both experimental models and research trials. Nutritional supplementation with beneficial microbes, such as probiotic bacteria, has been shown to have immune-related benefits, including enhancements of immune system responses, and has the potential to modify the variety that makes up the microbiota. The effectiveness of vaccines can be enhanced by using probiotics, which work by fostering a balanced gut microbiome. New research reveals that the immune response can be influenced by both live and dormant probiotic bacteria, as well as postbiotics, which are byproducts of the metabolism of probiotics. These substances have immunomodulatory functions and are essential in regulating how the immune system reacts to vaccines. This review aims to summarize the available research, explore the possible immune system functions that could explain these effects, and ultimately speculate about how postbiotics, aimed at the biotic microbiota, could improve the efficacy of vaccines. The review further addresses postbiotics' challenges, regulatory aspects, and future directives for biotherapeutic products that could enhance vaccine efficacy and be tailored for personalized treatments.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomePrecision MedicineProbioticsVaccinesAnimalsHumansVaccinesDisease preventionDysbiosisGut microbiotaImmune responsePersonalized medicinePostbioticsVaccines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.