Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39964391›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Three-dimensional MR elastography-based stiffness for assessing the status of Ki67 proliferation index and Cytokeratin-19 in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Lina Zhang, Yuanqiang Xiao, Mengshi Dong, Mengsi Li, Haimei Chen, Jin Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lina Zhang *Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yuanqiang Xiao *Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Mengshi Dong *Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Mengsi LiDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Haimei ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jin WangDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. wangjin3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6424-8254

Funding

China International Medical Foundation SKY Research Fund for Medical Imaging Z-2014-07-2101 and Z-2014-07-1912-15Clinical Research Foundation of the 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University YHJH201901Guangdong Basic and Applied Research Foundation 2021A1515010582Key Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province 2019B020235002National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271973 and 91959118The 'Five Five' Project of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University 2023WW103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the potential diagnostic value of MR elastography (MRE)-based stiffness to noninvasively predict the status of Ki67 proliferation index (PI) and Cytokeratin-19 (CK19) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

methodsTwo hundred and nineteen patients with histologically proven HCCs (high/low Ki67 PI, N = 134/85; +/-CK19, N = 47/172) who underwent preoperative MRI and MRE examinations were retrospectively enrolled. Imaging features and clinical information were analyzed to develop the clinical-radiologic models. Logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses were used to evaluate the status of Ki67 PI and CK19, and their model performances.

resultsTumor stiffness (TS) (p = 0.004) and TS/liver stiffness (LS) (p < 0.001) were significantly independent predictors of high Ki67 PI and positive CK19, respectively. By incorporating TS or TS/LS value, the AUCs of the clinical-radiological models have been improved for identifying high Ki67 PI from 0.796 to 0.819 (p = 0.113), and positive CK19 from 0.817 to 0.852 (p = 0.026). Patients with predicted high Ki67 PI/positive CK19 based on the combined models had worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with low Ki67 PI/negative CK19 (all p < 0.05), respectively. The combined statuses of predicted Ki67 PI and CK19 stratified patients into three distinct subgroups with significantly different RFS and OS (all p < 0.05). Notably, patients with predicted high Ki67 PI and positive CK19 had the worst prognosis.

conclusionsThree-dimensional MRE could be a promising tool for evaluating and stratifying the prognosis of HCC patients by predicting the status of Ki67 PI and CK19 preoperatively. KEY POINTS: Question Can MRE-based stiffness predict Ki67 PI and Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) in HCC? Findings MRE-based stiffness is an independent predictor of high Ki67 PI and CK19-positive and improves the diagnostic performance of clinical-radiological models predicting Ki67 PI and CK19 status. Clinical relevance MRE-based stiffness is a noninvasive predictor of high Ki67 PI and CK19-positive, and in combination with clinical-radiological models can be used for prognostic analysis, which could refine patients' selection for adjuvant therapy or surveillance.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularElasticity Imaging TechniquesImaging, Three-DimensionalKeratin-19Ki-67 AntigenLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCell ProliferationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorKeratin-19Ki-67 AntigenKRT19 protein, humanCytokeratin 19Elasticity imaging techniquesHepatocellular carcinomaKi-67Magnetic resonance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.