ArticleInternational journal of bipolar disorders2025
Quality of life in persons at risk for bipolar disorder: a two year prospective-longitudinal observational cohort study (BipoLife).
Article in International journal of bipolar disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outreach and Support in South London for Bipolar At-Risk States: pilot implementation of a specialist preventive service for adolescents and young adults at risk of developing bipolar disorders.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Mentalisation Switch: Therapist Reflective Capacity and Alliance Dynamics in Digital MCT+ for Bipolar Disorder-A Longitudinal Quantitative Case Series.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImproving quality of life (QoL) is important for the treatment of people with bipolar disorder (BD). Early-BipoLife is a German multicentre naturalistic, prospective-longitudinal observational cohort study investigating early recognition and intervention in people at increased risk of developing a BD. This analysis aims to investigate influencing factors and changes in QoL as a basis for the development of early intervention strategies in patients with at risk syndrome for BD.
methodA cohort of 1086 participants (15-35 years) with at least one risk factor (EPIbipolar criteria) for BD was assessed over the course of 2 years. Changes in QoL (WHOQOL-BREF) were evaluated in a mixed model for repeated measures.
resultsCompared to an age-matched comparison group, people at risk for BD showed significant lower QoL in all domains at baseline. The overall QoL of the psychological well-being domain of the WHOQOL-BREF increased over the 2 year study course (p < 0.001). The bipolar risk group (EPIbipolar) change from baseline divided into (a) decreasing, (b) increasing and (c) constant risk group in the course of 2 years. Baseline risk group assignment was not a significant predictor of change in QoL over 2 years for any of the QoL domains, but participants with an increase in risk over the 2-year course had a significantly smaller gain in QoL than the group with constant risk (p = 0.014) or decreasing risk (p < 0.001). Higher levels of QoL were associated with a higher self-rated ability to use coping strategies. Moreover, a higher level of functioning (GAF) at baseline was positively correlated with improvement of different QoL domains after 2 years.
conclusionPatients with a risk syndrome for BD reported significantly reduced QoL compared to their age-matched comparison group. Risk status monitoring might be beneficial to identify individuals who could profit from an intervention to increase their QoL. Further studies promoting the development of coping strategies for successful self-management could be helpful to improve overall mental health and positively influence QoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.