ArticleTraffic injury prevention2025
Mesopic and glare driving performance in a driving simulator.
Article in Traffic injury prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDifficulties in night driving due to deficits in visual function are a common problem among older drivers. Signage, hazards, and road markings can be more difficult to identify for those with presbyopia, especially in nighttime conditions that include glare from headlights. This study evaluated the visual function and driving abilities of participants in various lighting conditions to find efficient and effective testing procedures for predicting how older individuals will perform in night driving conditions.
methodsA driving simulator study was conducted to investigate the relationship between driving performance measures and visual function measures in different lighting conditions. Participants were examined in a laboratory setting to measure visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in bright light, dim light, and dim light with glare conditions. The participants were asked to drive in a driving simulator in simulated day, night, and night with glare conditions. Analysis using a linear mixed model was performed across the lighting conditions.
resultsThere are statistically significant relationships between the experimental variables, with age being an important factor. Age was found to have a statistically significant effect on the standard deviation of lateral position, which is a measure of vehicle control. Age was also found to have a statistically significant effect on reaction time and accuracy of a secondary identification task. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were found to have a statistically significant effect on mean velocity.
conclusionsResults suggest that visual acuity alone is insufficient to fully describe visual function for predicting performance in a driving task, but the ideal variables for prediction of performance in a night driving situation are not clear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.