Trial reportAIDS care2025
Comparing PrEP use among men who have sex with men with a recent incarceration history.
Trial report in AIDS care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized Controlled Trial Testing an HIV/STI Prevention Intervention Among People Leaving Incarceration Who Were Assigned Male at Birth, Have Sex with Men and A Substance Use Disorder.AIDS and behavior · 2025Trial
- Gay Community Connectedness, Internalized Homonegativity, and HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Attitudes and Use Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Georgia: A Mediation Analysis.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compares pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among men who have sex with men (MSM) with a recent history of incarceration across various factors known to contribute to HIV transmission risk, including sexual identity, race/ethnicity, sexual activity, incarceration history, injection drug use, and internalized homophobia. We analyzed baseline lifetime PrEP use (yes or no) of 170 male-identifying participants enrolled in a randomized-controlled trial in Los Angeles County between 2019 and 2022. Using logistic regression, we assessed the association of PrEP with sexual identity, socio-demographics, and potential confounders. Compared to gay/same-gender loving-identified participants, straight/heterosexual-identified (aOR = 0.10, CI = 0.02-0.49) and bi-pansexual-identified (0.39, 0.16-0.95) participants had reduced odds of PrEP use. Black/African American-identified participants had lower odds (0.15, 0.03-0.78) of PrEP use than White-identified participants. Participants reporting 3+ years cumulative lifetime incarceration had lower odds (0.28, 0.09-0.87) of PrEP use than participants reporting <6 months. Controlling for internalized homophobia rendered differences among sexual identity groups non-significant. A similar effect was not observed for race/ethnicity and lifetime incarceration. Internalized homophobia was an important driver of PrEP use differences among MSM along the lines of sexual identity but not along the lines of race/ethnicity or cumulative incarceration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.