ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2025
Deconer: An Evaluation Toolkit for Reference-based Deconvolution Methods Using Gene Expression Data.
Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- R4ST: a reference-guided graph-generative model for robust reconstruction of spatial transcriptomic profiles.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Pan-cancer analysis of spatial transcriptomics reveals heterogeneous tumor spatial microenvironment.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- soFusion: facilitating tissue structure identification via spatial multi-omics data fusion.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Diffusion-based generation of gene regulatory networks from scRNA-seq data with DigNet.Genome research · 2025Article
- Integrated multi-omics analysis reveals the functional and prognostic significance of lactylation-related gene PRDX1 in breast cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, computational methods for quantifying cell-type proportions from transcription data have gained significant attention, particularly those reference-based methods which have demonstrated high accuracy. However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive evaluation and guidance for available reference-based deconvolution methods in cell-type deconvolution analysis. In this study, we introduce Deconvolution Evaluator (Deconer), a comprehensive toolkit for the evaluation of reference-based deconvolution methods. Deconer provides various simulated and real gene expression datasets, including both bulk and single-cell sequencing data, and offers multiple visualization interfaces. By utilizing Deconer, we conducted systematic comparisons of 16 reference-based deconvolution methods from different perspectives, including method robustness, accuracy in deconvolving rare components, signature gene selection performance, and external reference construction capability. We also performed an in-depth analysis of the application scenarios and challenges in cell-type deconvolution methods. Finally, we provided constructive suggestions for users to select and develop cell-type deconvolution algorithms. This study provides novel insights for researchers, assisting them in choosing appropriate toolkits, applying solutions in clinical contexts, and advancing the development of deconvolution tools tailored to gene expression data. The tutorials, manual, source code, and demo data of Deconer are publicly available at https://honchkrow.github.io/Deconer/ and https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/biocode/tool/7577.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.