ArticleCancer medicine2025
Assessing the Economic Impact of Cancer Care: A Study on Out-of-Pocket Expenditures and Utilization in South Korea.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality and financial distress worldwide. In South Korea, the government introduced a benefit extension system in 2013 aimed at mitigating the financial strain associated with cancer treatment. However, cancer patients continue to bear significant out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses. This study aims to quantify the incremental healthcare utilization and OOP expenditures incurred by cancer patients in South Korea.
methodsUtilizing data from the 2019 Korean Health Panel (KHP), we assessed cancer-related healthcare utilization and OOP expenditures. A generalized linear regression model, adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic variables, was employed. Healthcare utilization was measured by hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and emergency room (ER) visits, while OOP expenditures encompassed services including both covered and not covered by the National Health Insurance (NHI) system.
resultsCancer patients experienced 0.39 more hospitalizations, 4.91 additional outpatient visits, and 0.11 more ER visits annually compared to non-cancer patients. Their incremental OOP expenses amounted to $482.8 per year, with $340.2 attributable to inpatient services. Notable variations in healthcare utilization and expenditures were observed across different cancer types. DISCUSSION: Despite the implementation of the benefit extension system, cancer patients continue to face considerable OOP expenses, particularly for inpatient care. With cancer incidence expected to rise, there is a pressing need for more comprehensive healthcare policies that alleviate the financial burden and prioritize cost-effective treatments for cancer patients.
conclusionThis study underscores the substantial economic impact of cancer on South Korean patients. Expanding the benefit extension system and promoting cost-effective care strategies are critical to easing the growing financial pressures on cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.