Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39963957›Full record

ArticleDrug metabolism and personalized therapy2025

An open-label, single dose, safety and pharmacokinetic study of

Eshita Sharma, Gayatri Ganu, Ketan Kshirsagar, Ashwin Shah, Umakant Mahale, Anirudh Mehta, Sujit Nair

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug metabolism and personalized therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Withanolides Are Detected in Human Urine Following Oral Administration of aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. A review of protective effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  5. Safety and Tolerability ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eshita SharmaPhytoveda Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India.
Gayatri GanuMprex Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India.
Ketan KshirsagarSangvi Multispeciality Hospital, Pune, India.
Ashwin ShahPhytoveda Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India.
Umakant MahalePhytoveda Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India.
Anirudh MehtaPhytoveda Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India.
Sujit NairPhytoveda Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7322-7375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives

methodsAn open label, single dose, clinical design comprising healthy volunteers was employed. The study evaluated PK parameters of the four bioactive constituents

resultsAfter oral administration of 2 WS capsules (200 mg each), the participants reported normal physical, hematological, and biochemical parameters with no abnormalities in safety metrics. For the four bioactives, the exposure parameters range between 0.472 and 4.468 ng/mL (C

conclusionsThe present study elucidated the PK of WS and showed that healthy male and female volunteers may safely consume WS capsules at a dose of 400 mg (2 capsules of 200 mg) without any harmful effects.

Indexed as

Plant ExtractsPlant RootsWithaniaAdministration, OralAdultFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMedicine, AyurvedicMiddle AgedTandem Mass SpectrometryWithanolidesYoung AdultAshwagandhaPlant Extractswithaferin AWithanolidesAshwagandhaclinical studiesnutraceuticalspharmacokineticssafetyW. somnifera

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.