Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39963943›Full record

ArticleBJS open2024

Artificial intelligence model for perigastric blood vessel recognition during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Guanjian Chen, Yequan Xie, Bin Yang, JiaNan Tan, Guangyu Zhong, Lin Zhong, Shengning Zhou, Fanghai Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guanjian ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yequan XieDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Bin YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
JiaNan TanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangyu ZhongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Lin ZhongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Shengning ZhouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Fanghai HanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5587-4827

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2021A1515111113Guangzhou Key Project Research and Development Program 202206080007National Natural Science Foundation of China 82003253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is standard surgical protocol for locally advanced gastric cancer. The surgical experience and skill in recognizing blood vessels and performing lymph node dissection differ between surgeons, which may influence intraoperative safety and postoperative oncological outcomes. Hence, the aim of this study was to develop an accurate and real-time deep learning-based perigastric blood vessel recognition model to assist intraoperative performance.

methodsThis was a retrospective study assessing videos of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The model was developed based on DeepLabv3+. Static performance was evaluated using precision, recall, intersection over union, and F1 score. Dynamic performance was verified using 15 intraoperative videos.

resultsThe study involved 2460 images captured from 116 videos. Mean(s.d.) precision, recall, intersection over union, and F1 score for the artery were 0.9442(0.0059), 0.9099(0.0163), 0.8635(0.0146), and 0.9267(0.0084) respectively. Mean(s.d.) precision, recall, intersection over union, and F1 score for the vein were 0.9349(0.0064), 0.8491(0.0259), 0.8015(0.0206), and 0.8897(0.0127) respectively. The model also performed well in recognizing perigastric blood vessels in 15 dynamic test videos. Intersection over union and F1 score in difficult image conditions, such as bleeding or massive surgical smoke in the field of view, were reduced, while images from obese patients resulted in satisfactory vessel recognition.

conclusionThe model recognized the perigastric blood vessels with satisfactory predictive value in the test set and performed well in the dynamic videos. It therefore shows promise with regard to increasing safety and decreasing accidental bleeding during laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGastrectomyLaparoscopyLymph Node ExcisionStomach NeoplasmsAgedDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID39963943
PMCPMC11833313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.