Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39963872›Full record

ArticleZoo biology

Steroid Hormone Metabolite Levels in European Minks: Implications for the Conservation of a Threatened Species.

Lorena Ortiz-Jiménez, Álvaro Navarro-Castilla, Gloria Fernández-Lázaro, Isabel Barja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoo biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorena Ortiz-JiménezDepartment of Biology, Zoology Unit, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7583-9738
Álvaro Navarro-CastillaDepartment of Biology, Zoology Unit, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0928-3978
Gloria Fernández-LázaroDepartment of Biological and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1022-7431
Isabel BarjaDepartment of Biology, Zoology Unit, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8354-5342

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Captive management of endangered species is a common conservation strategy. Monitoring the endocrine response related to reproduction and the increase of fecal cortisol metabolites is key to evaluating reproductive well-being and condition. We noninvasively assessed the endocrine status of captive European minks (Mustela lutreola) housed at Foundation for Research in Ethology and Biodiversity [FIEB] (a Spanish biodiversity conservation center) by measuring fecal glucocorticoid cortisol metabolite levels and testosterone, and progesterone metabolite levels. Males showed higher fecal cortisol and testosterone metabolite levels while no differences in fecal progesterone metabolite levels were found between sexes. Fecal levels of the three hormones were positively correlated. Individuals born in FIEB had lower fecal cortisol metabolites than those born in other centers and their values did not increase due to captivity duration. Hormone values obtained in FIEB could serve as a reference for this species management. However, further studies are required to ensure the well-being and reproductive success of captive and wild populations.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesHydrocortisoneProgesteroneTestosteroneAnimalsAnimals, ZooFecesFemaleMaleHydrocortisoneProgesteroneTestosteroneconservation physiologyendocrine monitoringfecal glucocorticoid cortisol metaboliteMustela lutreolareproductive hormones

Identifiers

PMID39963872
PMCPMC12131687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.