ArticleThe oncologist2025
Differentiating between renal medullary and clear cell renal carcinoma with a machine learning radiomics approach.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Renal Medullary Carcinoma: Utility of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to develop and validate a radiomics-based machine learning (ML) model to differentiate between renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) and clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC).
methodsThis retrospective Institutional Review Board -approved study analyzed CT images and clinical data from patients with RMC (n = 87) and ccRCC (n = 93). Patients without contrast-enhanced CT scans obtained before nephrectomy were excluded. A standard volumetric software package (MIM 7.1.4, MIM Software Inc.) was used for contouring, after which 949 radiomics features were extracted with PyRadiomics 3.1.0. Radiomics analysis was then performed with RadAR for differential radiomics analysis. ML was then performed with extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost 2.0.3) to differentiate between RMC and ccRCC. Three separate ML models were created to differentiate between ccRCC and RMC. These models were based on clinical demographics, radiomics, and radiomics incorporating hemoglobin electrophoresis for sickle cell trait, respectively.
resultsPerformance metrics for the 3 developed ML models were as follows: demographic factors only (AUC = 0.777), calibrated radiomics (AUC = 0.915), and calibrated radiomics with sickle cell trait incorporated (AUC = 1.0). The top 4 ranked features from differential radiomic analysis, ranked by their importance, were run entropy (preprocessing filter = original, AUC = 0.67), dependence entropy (preprocessing filter = wavelet, AUC = 0.67), zone entropy (preprocessing filter = original, AUC = 0.67), and dependence entropy (preprocessing filter = original, AUC = 0.66).
conclusionA radiomics-based machine learning model effectively differentiates between ccRCC and RMC. This tool can facilitate the radiologist's ability to suspicion and decrease the misdiagnosis rate of RMC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.