Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39963819›Full record

ReviewJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025

HMGB1 in Septic Muscle Atrophy: Roles and Therapeutic Potential for Muscle Atrophy and Regeneration.

Si-Yuan Qi, Qiqi Wu, Peng-Hui Xiang, Chao-Yao Hou, Zhaofeng Kang, Meng-Qi Chen, Chengla Yi, Xiangjun Bai, Tianyu Li, Zhanfei Li and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Si-Yuan QiDivision of Trauma Surgery, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical, Tongji Trauma Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qiqi WuDivision of Trauma Surgery, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical, Tongji Trauma Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Peng-Hui XiangDivision of Trauma Surgery, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical, Tongji Trauma Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Chao-Yao HouDivision of Trauma Surgery, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical, Tongji Trauma Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhaofeng KangDivision of Trauma Surgery, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical, Tongji Trauma Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Meng-Qi ChenDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Chengla YiDivision of Trauma Surgery, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical, Tongji Trauma Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiangjun BaiDivision of Trauma Surgery, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical, Tongji Trauma Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Tianyu LiDivision of Trauma Surgery, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical, Tongji Trauma Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhanfei LiDivision of Trauma Surgery, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical, Tongji Trauma Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wei-Ming XieDivision of Trauma Surgery, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical, Tongji Trauma Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

Research Fund of Tongji Hospital of Tongji Hospital affiliated with Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2024A11Research Fund of Tongji Hospital of Tongji Hospital affiliated with Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2024B36
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the treatment of septic myopathy presents significant challenges with implications for increased mortality rates and prolonged hospitalizations. Effective therapeutic strategies for septic myopathy remain elusive, highlighting an urgent need for novel therapeutic approaches. High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a conserved nonhistone nuclear protein that is released passively from deceased cells or actively secreted by activated immune cells, influencing both infectious and noninfectious inflammatory responses. Studies have indicated that HMGB1 likely plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of septic myopathy by crucial pathways associated with muscle atrophy and contributing to muscle regeneration under certain conditions. This review aims to summarize the possible mechanisms of HMGB1 in muscle atrophy and its potential in muscle regeneration, providing a theoretical basis for HMGB1 treatment of septic myopathy. Research shows that the dual role of HMGB1 is related to its specific forms, which are influenced to varying degrees by environmental factors. HMGB1 is a key participant in septic muscle atrophy, whereas HMGB1 shows therapeutic potential in muscle regeneration. One key mechanism by which HMGB1 contributes to septic muscle atrophy is through the exacerbation of inflammation. HMGB1 can amplify the inflammatory response by promoting the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which further damages muscle tissue. HMGB1 is also involved in promoting cell death in sepsis, which contributes to muscle degradation. Another important mechanism is the regulation of protein degradation systems. HMGB1 can activate the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy-lysosome pathway, both of which are crucial for the breakdown of muscle proteins during atrophy. Conversely, targeting HMGB1 has shown the potential to ameliorate muscle atrophy in various diseases. For instance, HMGB1 has been shown to promote muscle vascular regeneration, modify stem cell status and enhance stem cell migration and differentiation, all of which are beneficial for muscle repair and recovery. Pharmacological inhibition of HMGB1 has been explored, with several drugs demonstrating efficacy in reducing inflammation and muscle degradation in sepsis models. These findings suggest that HMGB1 inhibition could be a viable therapeutic approach for septic myopathy. However, the function of promoting muscle regeneration in septic myopathy needs further research. HMGB1 emerges as a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of muscle atrophy in sepsis. This review focuses on identifying the correlation between HMGB1 and septic myopathy, analysing the possible role of HMGB1 in disease development and examining the feasibility of HMGB1 as a therapeutic target.

Indexed as

HMGB1 ProteinMuscular AtrophyRegenerationSepsisAnimalsHumansMuscle, SkeletalHMGB1 Proteinclinical therapyHMGB1muscle atrophysepsistissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID39963819
PMCPMC11833301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.