Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39963677›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Correlational research on college students' physical exercise behavior, academic engagement, and self-efficacy.

Wei Gao, Jiaxin Chen, Zhi Tu, Ming Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei GaoSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China.
Jiaxin ChenSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China.
Zhi TuFujian Forestry Vocational Technical College, Nanping, China.
Ming LiSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the current status of physical exercise behavior, academic engagement, and self-efficacy among non-physical education college students. Additionally, it sought to analyze the relationships between these factors in order to explore the potential impact of physical exercise on learning and self-efficacy. Methods: To examine the current status and relationships between physical exercise behavior, academic engagement, and self-efficacy, this study used the Physical Activity Rating Scale (PARS-3), the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GESE) as research tools. A stratified random sampling method was employed, and non-physical education college students were selected as participants. A total of 1,596 valid questionnaires were analyzed. The data were processed using SPSS 26.0, AMOS 26.0, and Excel 2010, with statistical analyses including one-way ANOVA, correlation analysis, regression analysis, and mediation effect testing. Results: Physical exercise behavior among non-physical education students showed significant positive correlations with academic engagement ( Conclusion: Physical exercise behavior significantly predicts academic engagement, and a positive predictive relationship exists between physical exercise and self-efficacy. Additionally, self-efficacy plays a significant role in predicting academic engagement. Self-efficacy partially mediates the relationship between physical exercise behavior and academic engagement.

Indexed as

autonomous efficiencycollege studentslevel of learning engagementphysical exercisepositive self-confidence

Identifiers

PMID39963677
PMCPMC11830674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.