ArticleCureus2025
Follicular Lymphoma Detected in a Patient Undergoing Mohs Surgery: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mohs surgery is performed by surgeons trained in detecting specific cutaneous malignancies, including basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). Mohs-trained surgeons are typically not holistic pathologists and may, when working in isolation, fail to identify lesions that are not of cutaneous origin. The presence of a second lesion adjacent to the primary lesion is always a possibility. Such a lesion may be misinterpreted as an extension of the identified primary lesion, leading to unnecessary surgery, or it may be overlooked, resulting in a diagnostic failure. There is an advantage to conducting Mohs surgery with the surgeon and histopathologist reviewing the frozen section slides together, as this approach can aid in the identification of rarer diagnoses. Here, we describe the case of a female patient who underwent Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for a recurrent BCC located in the left preauricular area and medial helical rim of the pinna. The surgery involved two excisional stages. The first stage showed morphoeic BCC at all levels of all blocks. The second stage showed no BCC but revealed a dense inflammatory infiltrate. On further assessment by the consultant histopathologist, this infiltrate raised suspicion of possible lymphoma. Based on this consensus, no further Mohs excisional surgery was performed, and the surgical defect was closed. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) histological assessment and immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of cutaneous B-cell follicular lymphoma (FL). Thus, the incidental finding on the examination of fresh frozen MMS sections was correctly interpreted by the combined approach of the Mohs surgeon and pathologist, guiding appropriate and timely management for the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.