Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39963636›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Long-Term Outcomes Following Surgical Intervention for Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Systematic Review With a Minimum Five-Year Follow-Up.

Conor J Kilkenny, Gordon Daly, Shane Irwin, Tom Doyle, Anoushka R Saldanha, Lama M Alghawas, Niall McGoldrick, John Quinlan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Conor J KilkennyOrthopaedics, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, IRL.
Gordon DalySurgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, IRL.
Shane IrwinOrthopaedics, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, IRL.
Tom DoyleOrthopaedics, Galway University Hospital, Galway, IRL.
Anoushka R SaldanhaOrthopaedics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, IRL.
Lama M AlghawasOrthopaedics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, IRL.
Niall McGoldrickOrthopaedics, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, IRL.
John QuinlanTrauma and Orthopaedics, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, IRL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achilles tendon (TA) rupture is a common injury. However, there is limited evidence on the long-term outcomes following surgical repair. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and complications associated with surgical management of TA rupture with a minimum five-year follow-up duration. A literature search of Medline OVID, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The outcomes measured focused on postoperative complications, rates of re-rupture, contralateral rupture, and revision surgery. Six studies including 806 patients were included. Surgical repair demonstrated low re-rupture rates (4.2%) and revision rates (3.7%) at five years follow-up. Contralateral ruptures were uncommon (N=5), and 30 patients required revision surgery. However, complications such as deep vein thrombosis (6.3%) and wound infections (3.6%) were observed. Surgical repair of TA rupture demonstrates excellent long-term outcomes, including low rates of re-rupture and revision over a minimum of five years. While complications such as deep vein thrombosis and wound infections are observed, this systematic review highlights the reliability, durability, and overall success of surgical intervention in effectively treating this condition.

Indexed as

achilles rupturecomplicationsoperative managementtendontrauma

Identifiers

PMID39963636
PMCPMC11831706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.