ReviewCureus2025
Safety and Efficacy of Novel RNA Interference Therapeutic Agent Zilebesiran in People With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zilebesiran, a Small Interfering RNA Therapeutic Targeting Angiotensinogen: Mechanism, Clinical Evidence, Safety, and Implementation Considerations.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Therapeutics at the Crossroads: Pharmacological, Genetic, and Digital Frontiers.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Zilebesiran as an Innovative siRNA-Based Therapeutic Approach for Hypertension: Emerging Perspectives in Cardiovascular Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and renal diseases. Despite the availability of a wide variety of anti-hypertensive agents, a large number of patients on anti-hypertensive therapy have uncontrolled hypertension. Several factors, such as incorrect dosage and treatment non-adherence due to side effects, polypharmacy, and complex dosing regimens, can cause inadequate blood pressure regulation. Under phase 1 and 2 trials, Zilebesiran is a subcutaneously administered novel RNA interference therapeutic agent that reduces blood pressure by targeting angiotensinogen (AGT) synthesis. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Zilebesiran in reducing blood pressure. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a literature search was carried out across Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases. Our study included two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adult participants receiving Zilebesiran or placebo. The primary outcomes assessed were changes in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure and the incidence of adverse events at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Zilebesiran administration resulted in a significant reduction in 24-hour systolic blood pressure (-15.12 mmHg, 95% CI: -17.21 to -13.03) and diastolic blood pressure (-7.34 mmHg, 95% CI: -8.70 to -5.98) at 12 weeks compared to placebo with I² = 0%, indicating consistent results across trials. A statistically significant increase in total adverse events was noted (risk ratio: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.30), while serious adverse events did not differ significantly. The commonly encountered adverse effects included pain and erythema at the injection site and headache. Renal safety was supported by consistent serum creatinine and eGFR levels across the included studies. Zilebesiran demonstrates substantial efficacy in blood pressure reduction and exhibits a favorable safety profile, presenting a potential alternative for patients, particularly those struggling with adherence to daily oral medications. The inclusion of only two RCTS resulted in a small sample size, predominantly composed of white participants. This limits the generalizability of the results and highlights the need for further trials with a larger and more diverse study population. Further long-term investigations are also needed to establish the drug's impact on body weight, blood glucose levels, lipid profile, cardiovascular and hepatic health, and its efficacy when used alongside conventional antihypertensive medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.