ArticleBioImpacts : BI2025
Mosaic vaccine design targeting mutational spike protein of SAR-SCoV-2: An immunoinformatics approach.
Article in BioImpacts : BI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computationally guided multi-epitope vaccine design targeting oncoprotein BZLF1, EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2 for of EBV associated gastric cancer.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Immunoinformatics approach for design novel multi-epitope prophylactic and therapeutic vaccine based on capsid proteins L1 and L2 and oncoproteins E6 and E7 of human papillomavirus 16 and human papillomavirus 18 against cervical cancer.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2024Article
- Novel prophylactic and therapeutic multi-epitope vaccine based on Ag85A, Ag85B, ESAT-6, and CFP-10 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using an immunoinformatics approach.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2024Article
- A novel therapeutic multiepitope vaccine based on oncoprotein E6 and E7 of HPV 16 and 18: AnBioImpacts : BI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Presently, the development of effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 is absolutely necessary, especially regarding the emergence of new variants that cause increasing morbidity and fatalities. Methods: In the present study we designed a mosaic vaccine targeting the mutational spike protein of COVID-19 using a bioinformatics approach. Various immunoinformatics tools were utilized to provide the highest potential for a mosaic vaccine that could activate immune responses against COVID-19. Results: The evaluation of the constructed vaccine revealed that it is antigenic and immunogenic as well as nonallergenic. The physicochemical properties also show promising characteristics, including being highly stable and hydrophilic. As expected, the vaccine shows strong interactions with several important receptors including angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) and TLR8 by the lowest energy level, docking score and binding free energy. The vaccine binds to receptors via certain amino acids using various types of binding including salt bridges, hydrogen bonds, and other means. As shown in computationally derived models, the interactions promote activation of the immune response by eliciting the release of various cytokines, antibodies, memory B and T cells, as well as increasing of natural killer cell and dendrite cell counts. Conclusion: Therefore, the novel designed mosaic vaccine could be considered as a potential vaccine candidate for immediate production to stem the continuing and tragic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, several advanced experimental studies should be conducted to ensure and verify the effectivity and safety against SARS‑CoV‑2
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.