ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Text mining approach for feature extraction and cartilage disease grade classification using knee MRI radiology reports.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MRI radiology reporting processes can be improved by exploiting structured and semantically labelled data that can be fed to artificial intelligence (AI) tools. AI-based tools assisting radiology reporting can help to automatically individuate cartilage grading in textual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports, thus supporting clinicians' decisions regarding medical imaging utilisation, diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we extracted information (clinical findings, observations, anatomical regions, etc.) and classified knee cartilage degradation from medical reports utilising transfer-learning techniques applied to the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model and its variants, pre-trained on an Italian-language corpus. To realise this objective, we used a dataset of 750 MRI knee reports written by three radiologists who contributed to a manual annotation process to perform text classification (TC) and named entity recognition (NER) tasks. The dataset was obtained from an internal database of the IRCCS SYNLAB SDN. Seventy percent of the dataset was used for training, 10% was used for validation and 20% was used for testing. The best-performing configurations for NER and TC tasks were based on the pre-trained BERT model. The macro F1-scores obtained with the NER and TC models are 0.89 and 0.81, respectively. The accuracies calculated on the test set for both tasks are 0.96 and 0.99, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.