Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39963545›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025

Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With MRI Department Services and Staff in Saudi Hospitals.

Sami A Alghamdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sami A AlghamdiRadiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, 4545, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6404-8762

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction is a key component of healthcare quality and is essential for improving clinical outcomes. This study was conducted to assess patient satisfaction with MRI services across 10 hospitals in Saudi Arabia, focusing on both department services and staff performance. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from July to August 2024 and involved 496 patients at four private and six public hospitals who underwent MRI scans. A structured questionnaire comprising a five-point Likert scale was used to measure patient satisfaction with MRI department services and staff. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's chi-square test, t-tests, and ANOVA. Results: The majority of respondents (51.6% female) were 40-49 years of age, and 41.1% held a bachelor's degree. Overall, 92% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with MRI department services, particularly with registration efficiency (91.9%) and equipment quality (84.7%). However, satisfaction with waiting times was lower, with 66.1% of patients expressing satisfaction. Regarding MRI staff, 95.9% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with the privacy and confidentiality maintained during the procedure. A strong positive correlation (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) was observed between satisfaction with staff and overall MRI services. Conclusion: The patients reported high levels of satisfaction with MRI services, particularly with staff professionalism and facility quality. However, waiting times before MRI scans were identified as requiring improvement, particularly in public hospitals. Addressing this issue while maintaining high service standards can enhance patient satisfaction and overall experience.

Indexed as

healthcare qualityMRI servicesMRI staff performancepatient satisfactionSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID39963545
PMCPMC11830945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.