ArticleArthroplasty today2025
Short- and Mid-term Radiographic Outcomes of Ream-then-broaching Metaphyseal Cones During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to assess the short- and mid-term radiographic outcomes of a ream-then-broach metaphyseal cone design for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Methods: A retrospective, multicenter analysis of rTKA patients utilizing femoral and/or tibial metaphyseal cone placement from January 2017 to July 2022 was performed. Assessment of radiolucency was performed utilizing a novel "cones score" for radiolucency for tibial and femoral cones. Results: Sixty-four rTKAs (23 femoral and 59 tibial cones) with short-term follow-up (12-24 months) and 80 rTKA (24 femoral and 76 tibial cones) with mid-term follow-up (>24 months) were assessed. No intraoperative complications were reported. No cases of cone or stem aseptic loosening were observed. The cones scoring system had a significantly strong intraclass correlation between the 3 reviewers ( Conclusions: The utilization of a ream-then-broach metaphyseal cones demonstrated excellent radiographic stability at short- and mid-term follow-ups. The use of this method has minimal risk of intraoperative or short-term failures. Surgeons should be familiar with this type of cone implantation system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.