ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
A Qualitative Study of the Experience of Multidisciplinary Teamwork in Chronic Critical Illness Patients.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the reasons for poor multidisciplinary team (MDT) cooperation of Chronic Critical Illness (CCI) patients and their needs and expectations for carrying out MDT cooperation, with a view to providing references for improving MDT cooperation of CCI patients. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 15 members of the MDT of CCI patients in a hospital of Henan Province were conducted in September and October of 2024 using a descriptive qualitative design. The data were analyzed using the thematic analysis method developed by Braun and Clarke. Results: Three themes emerged: Theme 1: The collaborative experience of MDT members, with three sub-themes: essential MDT cooperation, absence of specialized MDT, and the nurse's diminished role; Theme 2: Barriers to MDT cooperation, with three sub-themes: unclear cooperation process and job responsibilities, lack of effective communication, and insufficient observation and feedback; Theme 3: Facilitators to MDT cooperation, divided into three sub-themes: timely and effective communication, a leading role, well-developed MDT tools. Conclusion: Due to the following deficiencies: unclear cooperation process and job responsibilities, lack of effective communication, and insufficient observation and feedback, it is urgent to take appropriate measures to promote MDT cooperation for CCI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.