ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Investigating the Use of Generative Adversarial Networks-Based Deep Learning for Reducing Motion Artifacts in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimization of Respiratory Training Methods for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning technology based on generative adversarial networks (GANs) in reducing motion artifacts in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine sequences. Methods: The training and testing datasets consisted of 2000 and 200 pairs of clear and blurry images, respectively, acquired through simulated motion artifacts in CMR cine sequences. These datasets were used to establish and train a deep learning GAN model. To assess the efficacy of the deep learning network in mitigating motion artifacts, 100 images with simulated motion artifacts and 37 images with real-world motion artifacts encountered in clinical practice were selected. Image quality pre- and post-optimization was assessed using metrics including Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), Leningrad Focus Measure, and a 5-point Likert scale. Results: After GAN optimization, notable improvements were observed in the PSNR, SSIM, and focus measure metrics for the 100 images with simulated artifacts. These metrics increased from initial values of 23.85±2.85, 0.71±0.08, and 4.56±0.67, respectively, to 27.91±1.74, 0.83±0.05, and 7.74±0.39 post-optimization. Additionally, the subjective assessment scores significantly improved from 2.44±1.08 to 4.44±0.66 (P<0.001). For the 37 images with real-world artifacts, the Tenengrad Focus Measure showed a significant enhancement, rising from 6.06±0.91 to 10.13±0.48 after artifact removal. Subjective ratings also increased from 3.03±0.73 to 3.73±0.87 (P<0.001). Conclusion: GAN-based deep learning technology effectively reduces motion artifacts present in CMR cine images, demonstrating significant potential for clinical application in optimizing CMR motion artifact management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.