ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
EEG analysis of speaking and quiet states during different emotional music stimuli.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Music has a profound impact on human emotions, capable of eliciting a wide range of emotional responses, a phenomenon that has been effectively harnessed in the field of music therapy. Given the close relationship between music and language, researchers have begun to explore how music influences brain activity and cognitive processes by integrating artificial intelligence with advancements in neuroscience. Methods: In this study, a total of 120 subjects were recruited, all of whom were students aged between 19 and 26 years. Each subject is required to listen to six 1-minute music segments expressing different emotions and speak at the 40-second mark. In terms of constructing the classification model, this study compares the classification performance of deep neural networks with other machine learning algorithms. Results: The differences in EEG signals between different emotions during speech are more pronounced compared to those in a quiet state. In the classification of EEG signals for speaking and quiet states, using deep neural network algorithms can achieve accuracies of 95.84% and 96.55%, respectively. Discussion: Under the stimulation of music with different emotions, there are certain differences in EEG between speaking and resting states. In the construction of EEG classification models, the classification performance of deep neural network algorithms is superior to other machine learning algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.