Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39963216›Full record

ArticleJACC. Case reports2025

Diagnosis and Management of Inadvertent Iliac Vein Injury During Structural Heart Interventions.

Ruxandra I Sava, Sandra Zendjebil, Maximilien Sochala, Morad Djebbar, Noemie Tence, Philippe Garot

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruxandra I SavaInterventional Cardiology Department, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Hôpital privé Jacques Cartier, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France.
Sandra ZendjebilInterventional Cardiology Department, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Hôpital privé Jacques Cartier, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France.
Maximilien SochalaInterventional Cardiology Department, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Hôpital privé Jacques Cartier, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France.
Morad DjebbarInterventional Cardiology Department, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Hôpital privé Jacques Cartier, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France.
Noemie TenceInterventional Cardiology Department, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Hôpital privé Jacques Cartier, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France.
Philippe GarotInterventional Cardiology Department, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Hôpital privé Jacques Cartier, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Femoral venous access is increasingly used by structural interventional cardiologists in procedures such as patent foramen ovale, atrial septal defect, and left atrial appendage closure, as well as tricuspid and mitral interventions. Containing less muscular and elastic fibers than arteries, veins are fragile structures that are more easily pierced than arteries. In this case series, we present 2 cases of iliac vein perforation during structural cardiology interventions. Even mild resistance on advancement of a large sheath should prompt suspicion of venous perforation, in which case control angiography should be performed at the end of the procedure, after withdrawal of the sheath distal to the suspected perforation site. In case of venous breach, implantation of a peripheral artery-dedicated covered stent can efficiently seal the perforation. This forethought can allow the avoidance of severe complications such as retroperitoneal hemorrhage.

Indexed as

bleedingiatrogenic vein perforationoutcomesstent

Identifiers

PMID39963216
PMCPMC11830246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.