ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2025
Survey of Notified Bodies reveals very limited use of conditional certification for high-risk medical devices.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical devices in Europe, all but drugs: time to radically change their regulation?Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Recommended methodologies for clinical investigations of high-risk medical devices-Conclusions from the European Union CORE-MD Project.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim was to identify the experiences of Notified Bodies (NBs) in Europe in applying restrictions or limitations to certificates for high-risk medical devices. A survey examining NB practices regarding restrictions or limitations applied to Class III and IIb implantable medical devices was conducted as part of the CORE-MD Horizon 2020 project. Thirteen NBs responded; three had issued certificates of conformity with restrictions or limitations. NBs reported challenges in collecting and providing data on conditional certification, which would likely increase their workload. Enhancing clarity of regulatory standards, improving data transparency, fostering stakeholders' collaboration, and providing targeted training are essential to ensure uniform and homogeneous application of conditional certifications across the EU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.